Recreation activity within the area

WTP for the improvement in day (picnic) recreation facilities in the Mount Lofty Range State Forests, South Australia

Fire
Flood
Storm
Earthquake
Tsunami
Heatwave
Calculated WTP Marginal Change being measured Recommendations
$4.23 AUD

WTP per day-vist site per household per year (max. 5 years)

 Useful for BT in Australia - be aware of generalised context - not NH specific

WTP Details

Hazard types identified
Not specified
Specific Value Type measured
Recreation activity
Currency Year - original study
WTP estimate - original study value
$3.71 per site per household per year
Currency - original study
AUD
WTP converted to $AU in original year from the study
$3.71 AUD
WTP measure
Mean
95% confidence interval (upper)
$4.94 AUD
95% confidence interval (lower)
$2.46 AUD
Other variables that significantly explain WTP

Cost, multi use tiral, overnight sites, day sites, time spent in forests, gender, historical site

Study Details

Value type applicable
Recreation
Study conducted in the context of a natural hazard?
No
Study quality
Average
Benefits transfer applicability
Average
Recommendations
Useful for BT in Australia - be aware of generalised context - not NH specific

Methods

Data collection method used
Choice modeling
Analysis model
Random parameter mixed logit
Modelled number of individuals
n/a
Modelled number of observations
2316

Sample Characteristics

Country/region studied
State Forests, Mount Lofty Ranges, South Australia
Country of source studies
Australia
Sampled population
Adelaide area (82%) and South Australia (18%)
Range in years of data
2012
Mean sample age
49
Percent Male
48
Percent Female
52
Mean sample income
n/a
Income units
n/a

Publication

Quantifying the non-timber values of South Australia's northern forest reserves

Windle, J., Rolfe, J., Tucker, G. 2012. Quantifying the non-timber values of South Australia's northern forest reserves. Environmental Economics Programme Center for Environmental Management. CQUniversity Australia.
Citation
Windle, et al. 2012
Authors
Windle, J., Rolfe, J., Tucker, G.
Year published
Peer reviewed?
No
Journal name
n/a

Additional information

Notes on this study

The value for picnic sites is significantly higher (at the 5% level) than the value for overnight sites.

WTP for the improvement in overnight recreation facilities in the Mount Lofty Range State Forests, South Australia

Fire
Flood
Storm
Earthquake
Tsunami
Heatwave
Calculated WTP Marginal Change being measured Recommendations
$2.44 AUD

WTP per overnight-visit site per household per year (max. 5 years)

 Useful for BT in Australia - be aware of generalised context - not NH specific

WTP Details

Hazard types identified
Not specified
Specific Value Type measured
Recreation activity
Currency Year - original study
WTP estimate - original study value
$2.14 per site per household per year
Currency - original study
AUD
WTP converted to $AU in original year from the study
$2.14 AUD
WTP measure
Mean
95% confidence interval (upper)
$2.68 AUD
95% confidence interval (lower)
$1.57 AUD
Other variables that significantly explain WTP

Cost, multi use tiral, overnight sites, day sites, time spent in forests, gender, historical site

Study Details

Value type applicable
Recreation
Study conducted in the context of a natural hazard?
No
Study quality
Average
Benefits transfer applicability
Average
Recommendations
Useful for BT in Australia - be aware of generalised context - not NH specific

Methods

Data collection method used
Choice modeling
Analysis model
Random parameter mixed logit
Modelled number of individuals
n/a
Modelled number of observations
2316

Sample Characteristics

Country/region studied
State Forests, Mount Lofty Ranges, South Australia
Country of source studies
Australia
Sampled population
Adelaide area (82%) and South Australia (18%)
Range in years of data
2012
Mean sample age
49
Percent Male
48
Percent Female
52
Mean sample income
n/a
Income units
n/a

Publication

Quantifying the non-timber values of South Australia's northern forest reserves

Windle, J., Rolfe, J., Tucker, G. 2012. Quantifying the non-timber values of South Australia's northern forest reserves. Environmental Economics Programme Center for Environmental Management. CQUniversity Australia.
Citation
Windle, et al. 2012
Authors
Windle, J., Rolfe, J., Tucker, G.
Year published
Peer reviewed?
No
Journal name
n/a

Additional information

Notes on this study

The value for picnic sites is significantly higher (at the 5% level) than the value for overnight sites.

WTP per km improvement of tracks and trails in the Mount Lofty Range State Forests, South Australia

Fire
Flood
Storm
Earthquake
Tsunami
Heatwave
Calculated WTP Marginal Change being measured Recommendations
$0.81 AUD

WTP per kilometre of track per household per year (max. 5 years)

 Useful for BT in Australia - be aware of generalised context - not NH specific

WTP Details

Hazard types identified
Not specified
Specific Value Type measured
Recreation activity
Currency Year - original study
WTP estimate - original study value
$0.71 per kilometre per household per year
Currency - original study
AUD
WTP converted to $AU in original year from the study
$0.71 AUD
WTP measure
Mean
95% confidence interval (upper)
$0.86 AUD
95% confidence interval (lower)
$0.54 AUD
Other variables that significantly explain WTP

Cost, multi use tiral, overnight sites, day sites, time spent in forests, gender, historical site

Study Details

Value type applicable
Recreation
Study conducted in the context of a natural hazard?
No
Study quality
Average
Benefits transfer applicability
Average
Recommendations
Useful for BT in Australia - be aware of generalised context - not NH specific

Methods

Data collection method used
Choice modeling
Analysis model
Random parameter mixed logit
Modelled number of individuals
n/a
Modelled number of observations
2316

Sample Characteristics

Country/region studied
State Forests, Mount Lofty Ranges, South Australia
Country of source studies
Australia
Sampled population
Adelaide area (82%) and South Australia (18%)
Range in years of data
2012
Mean sample age
49
Percent Male
48
Percent Female
52
Mean sample income
n/a
Income units
n/a

Publication

Quantifying the non-timber values of South Australia's northern forest reserves

Windle, J., Rolfe, J., Tucker, G. 2012. Quantifying the non-timber values of South Australia's northern forest reserves. Environmental Economics Programme Center for Environmental Management. CQUniversity Australia.
Citation
Windle, et al. 2012
Authors
Windle, J., Rolfe, J., Tucker, G.
Year published
Peer reviewed?
No
Journal name
n/a

Additional information

Notes on this study

These values are very consistent across the two forest areas (Mount Lofty and Mid North), suggesting that the same value estimate could be applied to any forest area in South Australia.

WTP per year for the use of recreational facilities in the Mid North State Forests, South Australia

Fire
Flood
Storm
Earthquake
Tsunami
Heatwave
Calculated WTP Marginal Change being measured Recommendations
$27.45 AUD

WTP per household per year (0.27 trips per year) for use of recreational facilities

 Useful for BT in Australia - be aware of generalised context - not NH specific

WTP Details

Hazard types identified
Not specified
Specific Value Type measured
Recreation activity
Currency Year - original study
WTP estimate - original study value
$24.09 per household per year
Currency - original study
AUD
WTP converted to $AU in original year from the study
$24.09 AUD
WTP measure
Mean
95% confidence interval (upper)
$31.03 AUD
95% confidence interval (lower)
$19.90 AUD
Other variables that significantly explain WTP

Cost

Study Details

Value type applicable
Recreation
Study conducted in the context of a natural hazard?
No
Study quality
Average
Benefits transfer applicability
Average
Recommendations
Useful for BT in Australia - be aware of generalised context - not NH specific

Methods

Data collection method used
Travel cost
Analysis model
Negative binomial travel cost model
Modelled number of individuals
795
Modelled number of observations
795

Sample Characteristics

Country/region studied
State Forests, Mid North, South Australia
Country of source studies
Australia
Sampled population
Adelaide area (82%) and South Australia (18%)
Range in years of data
2012
Mean sample age
49
Percent Male
48
Percent Female
52
Mean sample income
n/a
Income units
n/a

Publication

Quantifying the non-timber values of South Australia's northern forest reserves

Windle, J., Rolfe, J., Tucker, G. 2012. Quantifying the non-timber values of South Australia's northern forest reserves. Environmental Economics Programme Center for Environmental Management. CQUniversity Australia.
Citation
Windle, et al. 2012
Authors
Windle, J., Rolfe, J., Tucker, G.
Year published
Peer reviewed?
No
Journal name
n/a

Additional information

Notes on this study

These estimates are for the value of a recreational trip across the whole sample. It includes the zero values associated with the ‘non-visitors’ and also includes trips were there may have been a number of people in the group. It is not an estimate of an individual trip value. It is reasonable to assume that in the majority of cases, the information provided by respondents in the survey about the number of people included in a trip to the forests related to their immediate household.

WTP per trip for the use of recreational facilities in the Mid North State Forests, South Australia

Fire
Flood
Storm
Earthquake
Tsunami
Heatwave
Calculated WTP Marginal Change being measured Recommendations
$101.67 AUD

WTP per household per trip for use of recreational facilities

 Useful for BT in Australia - be aware of generalised context - not NH specific

WTP Details

Hazard types identified
Not specified
Specific Value Type measured
Recreation activity
Currency Year - original study
WTP estimate - original study value
$89.22 per household per trip
Currency - original study
AUD
WTP converted to $AU in original year from the study
$89.22 AUD
WTP measure
Mean
95% confidence interval (upper)
$114.93 AUD
95% confidence interval (lower)
$73.71 AUD
Other variables that significantly explain WTP

Cost

Study Details

Value type applicable
Recreation
Study conducted in the context of a natural hazard?
No
Study quality
Average
Benefits transfer applicability
Average
Recommendations
Useful for BT in Australia - be aware of generalised context - not NH specific

Methods

Data collection method used
Travel cost
Analysis model
Negative binomial travel cost model
Modelled number of individuals
795
Modelled number of observations
795

Sample Characteristics

Country/region studied
State Forests, Mid North, South Australia
Country of source studies
Australia
Sampled population
Adelaide area (82%) and South Australia (18%)
Range in years of data
2012
Mean sample age
49
Percent Male
48
Percent Female
52
Mean sample income
n/a
Income units
n/a

Publication

Quantifying the non-timber values of South Australia's northern forest reserves

Windle, J., Rolfe, J., Tucker, G. 2012. Quantifying the non-timber values of South Australia's northern forest reserves. Environmental Economics Programme Center for Environmental Management. CQUniversity Australia.
Citation
Windle, et al. 2012
Authors
Windle, J., Rolfe, J., Tucker, G.
Year published
Peer reviewed?
No
Journal name
n/a

Additional information

Notes on this study

These estimates are for the value of a recreational trip across the whole sample. It includes the zero values associated with the ‘non-visitors’ and also includes trips were there may have been a number of people in the group. It is not an estimate of an individual trip value. It is reasonable to assume that in the majority of cases, the information provided by respondents in the survey about the number of people included in a trip to the forests related to their immediate household.

WTP per trip for the use of the most visited recreational facilities in the Mount Lofty Range State Forests, South Australia

Fire
Flood
Storm
Earthquake
Tsunami
Heatwave
Calculated WTP Marginal Change being measured Recommendations
$102.24 AUD

WTP per household per trip for use of most visited recreational facilities

 Useful for BT in Australia - be aware of generalised context - not NH specific

WTP Details

Hazard types identified
Not specified
Specific Value Type measured
Recreation activity
Currency Year - original study
WTP estimate - original study value
$89.72 per household per trip
Currency - original study
AUD
WTP converted to $AU in original year from the study
$89.72 AUD
WTP measure
Mean
95% confidence interval (upper)
$118.59 AUD
95% confidence interval (lower)
$71.66 AUD
Other variables that significantly explain WTP

Cost, education, income

Study Details

Value type applicable
Recreation
Study conducted in the context of a natural hazard?
No
Study quality
Average
Benefits transfer applicability
Average
Recommendations
Useful for BT in Australia - be aware of generalised context - not NH specific

Methods

Data collection method used
Travel cost
Analysis model
Negative binomial travel cost model
Modelled number of individuals
802
Modelled number of observations
802

Sample Characteristics

Country/region studied
most visited places in State Forests, Mount Lofty Ranges, South Australia
Country of source studies
Australia
Sampled population
Adelaide area (82%) and South Australia (18%)
Range in years of data
2012
Mean sample age
49
Percent Male
48
Percent Female
52
Mean sample income
n/a
Income units
n/a

Publication

Quantifying the non-timber values of South Australia's northern forest reserves

Windle, J., Rolfe, J., Tucker, G. 2012. Quantifying the non-timber values of South Australia's northern forest reserves. Environmental Economics Programme Center for Environmental Management. CQUniversity Australia.
Citation
Windle, et al. 2012
Authors
Windle, J., Rolfe, J., Tucker, G.
Year published
Peer reviewed?
No
Journal name
n/a

Additional information

Notes on this study

These estimates are for the value of a recreational trip across the whole sample. It includes the zero values associated with the ‘non-visitors’ and also includes trips were there may have been a number of people in the group. It is not an estimate of an individual trip value. It is reasonable to assume that in the majority of cases, the information provided by respondents in the survey about the number of people included in a trip to the forests related to their immediate household.

WTP per year for the use of the most visited recreational facilities in the Mount Lofty Range State Forests, South Australia

Fire
Flood
Storm
Earthquake
Tsunami
Heatwave
Calculated WTP Marginal Change being measured Recommendations
$238.02 AUD

WTP per household per year (2.25 trips) for use of most visited recreational facilities

 Useful for BT in Australia - be aware of generalised context - not NH specific

WTP Details

Hazard types identified
Not specified
Specific Value Type measured
Recreation activity
Currency Year - original study
WTP estimate - original study value
$208.87 per household per year
Currency - original study
AUD
WTP converted to $AU in original year from the study
$208.87 AUD
WTP measure
Mean
95% confidence interval (upper)
$266.83 AUD
95% confidence interval (lower)
$161.24 AUD
Other variables that significantly explain WTP

Cost, education, income

Study Details

Value type applicable
Recreation
Study conducted in the context of a natural hazard?
No
Study quality
Average
Benefits transfer applicability
Average
Recommendations
Useful for BT in Australia - be aware of generalised context - not NH specific

Methods

Data collection method used
Travel cost
Analysis model
Negative binomial travel cost model
Modelled number of individuals
802
Modelled number of observations
802

Sample Characteristics

Country/region studied
most visited places in State Forests, Mount Lofty Ranges, South Australia
Country of source studies
Australia
Sampled population
Adelaide area (82%) and South Australia (18%)
Range in years of data
2012
Mean sample age
49
Percent Male
48
Percent Female
52
Mean sample income
n/a
Income units
n/a

Publication

Quantifying the non-timber values of South Australia's northern forest reserves

Windle, J., Rolfe, J., Tucker, G. 2012. Quantifying the non-timber values of South Australia's northern forest reserves. Environmental Economics Programme Center for Environmental Management. CQUniversity Australia.
Citation
Windle, et al. 2012
Authors
Windle, J., Rolfe, J., Tucker, G.
Year published
Peer reviewed?
No
Journal name
n/a

Additional information

Notes on this study

These estimates are for the value of a recreational trip across the whole sample. It includes the zero values associated with the ‘non-visitors’ and also includes trips were there may have been a number of people in the group. It is not an estimate of an individual trip value. It is reasonable to assume that in the majority of cases, the information provided by respondents in the survey about the number of people included in a trip to the forests related to their immediate household.

WTP per year for the use of recreational facilities in the Mount Lofty Range State Forests, South Australia

Fire
Flood
Storm
Earthquake
Tsunami
Heatwave
Calculated WTP Marginal Change being measured Recommendations
$48.49 AUD

WTP per household per year (1.33 trips) for use of recreational facilities

 Useful for BT in Australia - be aware of generalised context - not NH specific

WTP Details

Hazard types identified
Not specified
Specific Value Type measured
Recreation activity
Currency Year - original study
WTP estimate - original study value
$42.55 per household per year
Currency - original study
AUD
WTP converted to $AU in original year from the study
$42.55 AUD
WTP measure
Mean
95% confidence interval (upper)
$48.73 AUD
95% confidence interval (lower)
$37.60 AUD
Other variables that significantly explain WTP

Cost, education, income

Study Details

Value type applicable
Recreation
Study conducted in the context of a natural hazard?
No
Study quality
Average
Benefits transfer applicability
Average
Recommendations
Useful for BT in Australia - be aware of generalised context - not NH specific

Methods

Data collection method used
Travel cost
Analysis model
Negative binomial travel cost model
Modelled number of individuals
804
Modelled number of observations
804

Sample Characteristics

Country/region studied
State Forests, Mount Lofty Ranges, South Australia
Country of source studies
Australia
Sampled population
Adelaide area (82%) and South Australia (18%)
Range in years of data
2012
Mean sample age
49
Percent Male
48
Percent Female
52
Mean sample income
n/a
Income units
n/a

Publication

Quantifying the non-timber values of South Australia's northern forest reserves

Windle, J., Rolfe, J., Tucker, G. 2012. Quantifying the non-timber values of South Australia's northern forest reserves. Environmental Economics Programme Center for Environmental Management. CQUniversity Australia.
Citation
Windle, et al. 2012
Authors
Windle, J., Rolfe, J., Tucker, G.
Year published
Peer reviewed?
No
Journal name
n/a

Additional information

Notes on this study

These estimates are for the value of a recreational trip across the whole sample. It includes the zero values associated with the ‘non-visitors’ and also includes trips were there may have been a number of people in the group. It is not an estimate of an individual trip value. It is reasonable to assume that in the majority of cases, the information provided by respondents in the survey about the number of people included in a trip to the forests related to their immediate household.

WTP for improvement in the number of overnight sites and picnic sites in the Mount Lofty Range State Forest, South Australia

Fire
Flood
Storm
Earthquake
Tsunami
Heatwave
Calculated WTP Marginal Change being measured Recommendations
$36.45 AUD

WTP per household per trip

 Useful for BT in Australia - be aware of generalised context - not NH specific

WTP Details

Hazard types identified
Not specified
Specific Value Type measured
Recreation activity
Currency Year - original study
WTP estimate - original study value
$31.99 per household per trip
Currency - original study
AUD
WTP converted to $AU in original year from the study
$31.99 AUD
WTP measure
Mean
95% confidence interval (upper)
$36.64 AUD
95% confidence interval (lower)
$28.27 AUD
Other variables that significantly explain WTP

Cost, education, income

Study Details

Value type applicable
Recreation
Study conducted in the context of a natural hazard?
No
Study quality
Poor
Benefits transfer applicability
Average
Recommendations
Useful for BT in Australia - be aware of generalised context - not NH specific

Methods

Data collection method used
Travel cost
Analysis model
Negative binomial travel cost model
Modelled number of individuals
n/a
Modelled number of observations
804

Sample Characteristics

Country/region studied
State Forests, Mount Lofty Ranges, South Australia
Country of source studies
Australia
Sampled population
South Australia
Range in years of data
2012
Mean sample age
49
Percent Male
48
Percent Female
52
Mean sample income
n/a
Income units
n/a

Publication

Quantifying the non-timber values of South Australia's northern forest reserves

Windle, J., Rolfe, J., Tucker, G. 2012. Quantifying the non-timber values of South Australia's northern forest reserves. Environmental Economics Programme Center for Environmental Management. CQUniversity Australia.
Citation
Windle, et al. 2012
Authors
Windle, J., Rolfe, J., Tucker, G.
Year published
Peer reviewed?
No
Journal name
n/a

Additional information

Notes on this study

These estimates are for the value of a recreational trip across the whole sample. It includes the zero values associated with the ‘non-visitors’ and also includes trips were there may have been a number of people in the group. It is not an estimate of an individual trip value. It is reasonable to assume that in the majority of cases, the information provided by respondents in the survey about the number of people included in a trip to the forests related to their immediate household.
Reset Export Selected