Recreation activity within the area
WTP for the improvement in day (picnic) recreation facilities in the Mount Lofty Range State Forests, South Australia Fire
Flood
Storm
Earthquake
Tsunami
Heatwave
WTP DetailsHazard types identified
Not specified
Specific Value Type measured
Recreation activity
Currency Year - original study
WTP estimate - original study value
$3.71 per site per household per year
Currency - original study
AUD
WTP converted to $AU in original year from the study
$3.71 AUD
WTP measure
Mean
95% confidence interval (upper)
$4.94 AUD
95% confidence interval (lower)
$2.46 AUD
Other variables that significantly explain WTP
Cost, multi use tiral, overnight sites, day sites, time spent in forests, gender, historical site Study DetailsValue type applicable
Recreation
Study conducted in the context of a natural hazard?
No
Study quality
Average
Benefits transfer applicability
Average
Recommendations
Useful for BT in Australia - be aware of generalised context - not NH specific
MethodsData collection method used
Choice modeling
Analysis model
Random parameter mixed logit
Modelled number of individuals
n/a
Modelled number of observations
2316
Sample CharacteristicsCountry/region studied
State Forests, Mount Lofty Ranges, South Australia
Country of source studies
Australia
Sampled population
Adelaide area (82%) and South Australia (18%)
Range in years of data
2012
Mean sample age
49
Percent Male
48
Percent Female
52
Mean sample income
n/a
Income units
n/a
PublicationQuantifying the non-timber values of South Australia's northern forest reservesWindle, J., Rolfe, J., Tucker, G. 2012. Quantifying the non-timber values of South Australia's northern forest reserves. Environmental Economics Programme Center for Environmental Management. CQUniversity Australia.
Citation
Windle, et al. 2012
Year published
Peer reviewed?
No
Journal name
n/a
Additional informationNotes on this study
The value for picnic sites is significantly higher (at the 5% level) than the value for overnight sites. |
||||||
WTP for the improvement in overnight recreation facilities in the Mount Lofty Range State Forests, South Australia Fire
Flood
Storm
Earthquake
Tsunami
Heatwave
WTP DetailsHazard types identified
Not specified
Specific Value Type measured
Recreation activity
Currency Year - original study
WTP estimate - original study value
$2.14 per site per household per year
Currency - original study
AUD
WTP converted to $AU in original year from the study
$2.14 AUD
WTP measure
Mean
95% confidence interval (upper)
$2.68 AUD
95% confidence interval (lower)
$1.57 AUD
Other variables that significantly explain WTP
Cost, multi use tiral, overnight sites, day sites, time spent in forests, gender, historical site Study DetailsValue type applicable
Recreation
Study conducted in the context of a natural hazard?
No
Study quality
Average
Benefits transfer applicability
Average
Recommendations
Useful for BT in Australia - be aware of generalised context - not NH specific
MethodsData collection method used
Choice modeling
Analysis model
Random parameter mixed logit
Modelled number of individuals
n/a
Modelled number of observations
2316
Sample CharacteristicsCountry/region studied
State Forests, Mount Lofty Ranges, South Australia
Country of source studies
Australia
Sampled population
Adelaide area (82%) and South Australia (18%)
Range in years of data
2012
Mean sample age
49
Percent Male
48
Percent Female
52
Mean sample income
n/a
Income units
n/a
PublicationQuantifying the non-timber values of South Australia's northern forest reservesWindle, J., Rolfe, J., Tucker, G. 2012. Quantifying the non-timber values of South Australia's northern forest reserves. Environmental Economics Programme Center for Environmental Management. CQUniversity Australia.
Citation
Windle, et al. 2012
Year published
Peer reviewed?
No
Journal name
n/a
Additional informationNotes on this study
The value for picnic sites is significantly higher (at the 5% level) than the value for overnight sites. |
||||||
WTP per km improvement of tracks and trails in the Mount Lofty Range State Forests, South Australia Fire
Flood
Storm
Earthquake
Tsunami
Heatwave
WTP DetailsHazard types identified
Not specified
Specific Value Type measured
Recreation activity
Currency Year - original study
WTP estimate - original study value
$0.71 per kilometre per household per year
Currency - original study
AUD
WTP converted to $AU in original year from the study
$0.71 AUD
WTP measure
Mean
95% confidence interval (upper)
$0.86 AUD
95% confidence interval (lower)
$0.54 AUD
Other variables that significantly explain WTP
Cost, multi use tiral, overnight sites, day sites, time spent in forests, gender, historical site Study DetailsValue type applicable
Recreation
Study conducted in the context of a natural hazard?
No
Study quality
Average
Benefits transfer applicability
Average
Recommendations
Useful for BT in Australia - be aware of generalised context - not NH specific
MethodsData collection method used
Choice modeling
Analysis model
Random parameter mixed logit
Modelled number of individuals
n/a
Modelled number of observations
2316
Sample CharacteristicsCountry/region studied
State Forests, Mount Lofty Ranges, South Australia
Country of source studies
Australia
Sampled population
Adelaide area (82%) and South Australia (18%)
Range in years of data
2012
Mean sample age
49
Percent Male
48
Percent Female
52
Mean sample income
n/a
Income units
n/a
PublicationQuantifying the non-timber values of South Australia's northern forest reservesWindle, J., Rolfe, J., Tucker, G. 2012. Quantifying the non-timber values of South Australia's northern forest reserves. Environmental Economics Programme Center for Environmental Management. CQUniversity Australia.
Citation
Windle, et al. 2012
Year published
Peer reviewed?
No
Journal name
n/a
Additional informationNotes on this study
These values are very consistent across the two forest areas (Mount Lofty and Mid North), suggesting that the same value estimate could be applied to any forest area in South Australia. |
||||||
WTP per year for the use of recreational facilities in the Mid North State Forests, South Australia Fire
Flood
Storm
Earthquake
Tsunami
Heatwave
WTP DetailsHazard types identified
Not specified
Specific Value Type measured
Recreation activity
Currency Year - original study
WTP estimate - original study value
$24.09 per household per year
Currency - original study
AUD
WTP converted to $AU in original year from the study
$24.09 AUD
WTP measure
Mean
95% confidence interval (upper)
$31.03 AUD
95% confidence interval (lower)
$19.90 AUD
Other variables that significantly explain WTP
Cost Study DetailsValue type applicable
Recreation
Study conducted in the context of a natural hazard?
No
Study quality
Average
Benefits transfer applicability
Average
Recommendations
Useful for BT in Australia - be aware of generalised context - not NH specific
MethodsData collection method used
Travel cost
Analysis model
Negative binomial travel cost model
Modelled number of individuals
795
Modelled number of observations
795
Sample CharacteristicsCountry/region studied
State Forests, Mid North, South Australia
Country of source studies
Australia
Sampled population
Adelaide area (82%) and South Australia (18%)
Range in years of data
2012
Mean sample age
49
Percent Male
48
Percent Female
52
Mean sample income
n/a
Income units
n/a
PublicationQuantifying the non-timber values of South Australia's northern forest reservesWindle, J., Rolfe, J., Tucker, G. 2012. Quantifying the non-timber values of South Australia's northern forest reserves. Environmental Economics Programme Center for Environmental Management. CQUniversity Australia.
Citation
Windle, et al. 2012
Year published
Peer reviewed?
No
Journal name
n/a
Additional informationNotes on this study
These estimates are for the value of a recreational trip across the whole sample. It includes the zero values associated with the ‘non-visitors’ and also includes trips were there may have been a number of people in the group. It is not an estimate of an individual trip value. It is reasonable to assume that in the majority of cases, the information provided by respondents in the survey about the number of people included in a trip to the forests related to their immediate household. |
||||||
WTP per trip for the use of recreational facilities in the Mid North State Forests, South Australia Fire
Flood
Storm
Earthquake
Tsunami
Heatwave
WTP DetailsHazard types identified
Not specified
Specific Value Type measured
Recreation activity
Currency Year - original study
WTP estimate - original study value
$89.22 per household per trip
Currency - original study
AUD
WTP converted to $AU in original year from the study
$89.22 AUD
WTP measure
Mean
95% confidence interval (upper)
$114.93 AUD
95% confidence interval (lower)
$73.71 AUD
Other variables that significantly explain WTP
Cost Study DetailsValue type applicable
Recreation
Study conducted in the context of a natural hazard?
No
Study quality
Average
Benefits transfer applicability
Average
Recommendations
Useful for BT in Australia - be aware of generalised context - not NH specific
MethodsData collection method used
Travel cost
Analysis model
Negative binomial travel cost model
Modelled number of individuals
795
Modelled number of observations
795
Sample CharacteristicsCountry/region studied
State Forests, Mid North, South Australia
Country of source studies
Australia
Sampled population
Adelaide area (82%) and South Australia (18%)
Range in years of data
2012
Mean sample age
49
Percent Male
48
Percent Female
52
Mean sample income
n/a
Income units
n/a
PublicationQuantifying the non-timber values of South Australia's northern forest reservesWindle, J., Rolfe, J., Tucker, G. 2012. Quantifying the non-timber values of South Australia's northern forest reserves. Environmental Economics Programme Center for Environmental Management. CQUniversity Australia.
Citation
Windle, et al. 2012
Year published
Peer reviewed?
No
Journal name
n/a
Additional informationNotes on this study
These estimates are for the value of a recreational trip across the whole sample. It includes the zero values associated with the ‘non-visitors’ and also includes trips were there may have been a number of people in the group. It is not an estimate of an individual trip value. It is reasonable to assume that in the majority of cases, the information provided by respondents in the survey about the number of people included in a trip to the forests related to their immediate household. |
||||||
WTP per trip for the use of the most visited recreational facilities in the Mount Lofty Range State Forests, South Australia Fire
Flood
Storm
Earthquake
Tsunami
Heatwave
WTP DetailsHazard types identified
Not specified
Specific Value Type measured
Recreation activity
Currency Year - original study
WTP estimate - original study value
$89.72 per household per trip
Currency - original study
AUD
WTP converted to $AU in original year from the study
$89.72 AUD
WTP measure
Mean
95% confidence interval (upper)
$118.59 AUD
95% confidence interval (lower)
$71.66 AUD
Other variables that significantly explain WTP
Cost, education, income Study DetailsValue type applicable
Recreation
Study conducted in the context of a natural hazard?
No
Study quality
Average
Benefits transfer applicability
Average
Recommendations
Useful for BT in Australia - be aware of generalised context - not NH specific
MethodsData collection method used
Travel cost
Analysis model
Negative binomial travel cost model
Modelled number of individuals
802
Modelled number of observations
802
Sample CharacteristicsCountry/region studied
most visited places in State Forests, Mount Lofty Ranges, South Australia
Country of source studies
Australia
Sampled population
Adelaide area (82%) and South Australia (18%)
Range in years of data
2012
Mean sample age
49
Percent Male
48
Percent Female
52
Mean sample income
n/a
Income units
n/a
PublicationQuantifying the non-timber values of South Australia's northern forest reservesWindle, J., Rolfe, J., Tucker, G. 2012. Quantifying the non-timber values of South Australia's northern forest reserves. Environmental Economics Programme Center for Environmental Management. CQUniversity Australia.
Citation
Windle, et al. 2012
Year published
Peer reviewed?
No
Journal name
n/a
Additional informationNotes on this study
These estimates are for the value of a recreational trip across the whole sample. It includes the zero values associated with the ‘non-visitors’ and also includes trips were there may have been a number of people in the group. It is not an estimate of an individual trip value. It is reasonable to assume that in the majority of cases, the information provided by respondents in the survey about the number of people included in a trip to the forests related to their immediate household. |
||||||
WTP per year for the use of the most visited recreational facilities in the Mount Lofty Range State Forests, South Australia Fire
Flood
Storm
Earthquake
Tsunami
Heatwave
WTP DetailsHazard types identified
Not specified
Specific Value Type measured
Recreation activity
Currency Year - original study
WTP estimate - original study value
$208.87 per household per year
Currency - original study
AUD
WTP converted to $AU in original year from the study
$208.87 AUD
WTP measure
Mean
95% confidence interval (upper)
$266.83 AUD
95% confidence interval (lower)
$161.24 AUD
Other variables that significantly explain WTP
Cost, education, income Study DetailsValue type applicable
Recreation
Study conducted in the context of a natural hazard?
No
Study quality
Average
Benefits transfer applicability
Average
Recommendations
Useful for BT in Australia - be aware of generalised context - not NH specific
MethodsData collection method used
Travel cost
Analysis model
Negative binomial travel cost model
Modelled number of individuals
802
Modelled number of observations
802
Sample CharacteristicsCountry/region studied
most visited places in State Forests, Mount Lofty Ranges, South Australia
Country of source studies
Australia
Sampled population
Adelaide area (82%) and South Australia (18%)
Range in years of data
2012
Mean sample age
49
Percent Male
48
Percent Female
52
Mean sample income
n/a
Income units
n/a
PublicationQuantifying the non-timber values of South Australia's northern forest reservesWindle, J., Rolfe, J., Tucker, G. 2012. Quantifying the non-timber values of South Australia's northern forest reserves. Environmental Economics Programme Center for Environmental Management. CQUniversity Australia.
Citation
Windle, et al. 2012
Year published
Peer reviewed?
No
Journal name
n/a
Additional informationNotes on this study
These estimates are for the value of a recreational trip across the whole sample. It includes the zero values associated with the ‘non-visitors’ and also includes trips were there may have been a number of people in the group. It is not an estimate of an individual trip value. It is reasonable to assume that in the majority of cases, the information provided by respondents in the survey about the number of people included in a trip to the forests related to their immediate household. |
||||||
WTP per year for the use of recreational facilities in the Mount Lofty Range State Forests, South Australia Fire
Flood
Storm
Earthquake
Tsunami
Heatwave
WTP DetailsHazard types identified
Not specified
Specific Value Type measured
Recreation activity
Currency Year - original study
WTP estimate - original study value
$42.55 per household per year
Currency - original study
AUD
WTP converted to $AU in original year from the study
$42.55 AUD
WTP measure
Mean
95% confidence interval (upper)
$48.73 AUD
95% confidence interval (lower)
$37.60 AUD
Other variables that significantly explain WTP
Cost, education, income Study DetailsValue type applicable
Recreation
Study conducted in the context of a natural hazard?
No
Study quality
Average
Benefits transfer applicability
Average
Recommendations
Useful for BT in Australia - be aware of generalised context - not NH specific
MethodsData collection method used
Travel cost
Analysis model
Negative binomial travel cost model
Modelled number of individuals
804
Modelled number of observations
804
Sample CharacteristicsCountry/region studied
State Forests, Mount Lofty Ranges, South Australia
Country of source studies
Australia
Sampled population
Adelaide area (82%) and South Australia (18%)
Range in years of data
2012
Mean sample age
49
Percent Male
48
Percent Female
52
Mean sample income
n/a
Income units
n/a
PublicationQuantifying the non-timber values of South Australia's northern forest reservesWindle, J., Rolfe, J., Tucker, G. 2012. Quantifying the non-timber values of South Australia's northern forest reserves. Environmental Economics Programme Center for Environmental Management. CQUniversity Australia.
Citation
Windle, et al. 2012
Year published
Peer reviewed?
No
Journal name
n/a
Additional informationNotes on this study
These estimates are for the value of a recreational trip across the whole sample. It includes the zero values associated with the ‘non-visitors’ and also includes trips were there may have been a number of people in the group. It is not an estimate of an individual trip value. It is reasonable to assume that in the majority of cases, the information provided by respondents in the survey about the number of people included in a trip to the forests related to their immediate household. |
||||||
WTP for improvement in the number of overnight sites and picnic sites in the Mount Lofty Range State Forest, South Australia Fire
Flood
Storm
Earthquake
Tsunami
Heatwave
WTP DetailsHazard types identified
Not specified
Specific Value Type measured
Recreation activity
Currency Year - original study
WTP estimate - original study value
$31.99 per household per trip
Currency - original study
AUD
WTP converted to $AU in original year from the study
$31.99 AUD
WTP measure
Mean
95% confidence interval (upper)
$36.64 AUD
95% confidence interval (lower)
$28.27 AUD
Other variables that significantly explain WTP
Cost, education, income Study DetailsValue type applicable
Recreation
Study conducted in the context of a natural hazard?
No
Study quality
Poor
Benefits transfer applicability
Average
Recommendations
Useful for BT in Australia - be aware of generalised context - not NH specific
MethodsData collection method used
Travel cost
Analysis model
Negative binomial travel cost model
Modelled number of individuals
n/a
Modelled number of observations
804
Sample CharacteristicsCountry/region studied
State Forests, Mount Lofty Ranges, South Australia
Country of source studies
Australia
Sampled population
South Australia
Range in years of data
2012
Mean sample age
49
Percent Male
48
Percent Female
52
Mean sample income
n/a
Income units
n/a
PublicationQuantifying the non-timber values of South Australia's northern forest reservesWindle, J., Rolfe, J., Tucker, G. 2012. Quantifying the non-timber values of South Australia's northern forest reserves. Environmental Economics Programme Center for Environmental Management. CQUniversity Australia.
Citation
Windle, et al. 2012
Year published
Peer reviewed?
No
Journal name
n/a
Additional informationNotes on this study
These estimates are for the value of a recreational trip across the whole sample. It includes the zero values associated with the ‘non-visitors’ and also includes trips were there may have been a number of people in the group. It is not an estimate of an individual trip value. It is reasonable to assume that in the majority of cases, the information provided by respondents in the survey about the number of people included in a trip to the forests related to their immediate household. |